Appendix 5 -- IS Body of Knowledge
A specific discipline may be defined by its associated body of knowledge. The information systems body of knowledge consists of three major subject areas:
1.0 Information Technology
2.0 Organizational and Management Concepts
3.0 Theory and Development of Systems
Each subject area contains major topics and each major topic
contains subtopics which are the lowest level curriculum elements
of the body of knowledge. A fourth level with more detail for
third level elements is useful in describing curriculum content.
Sources Used in Defining the Body of Knowledge
Each of these subject areas represents specific domains of
knowledge. The entire body of knowledge consists of 506 elements
in a four level hierarchy (Nunamaker, Couger and Davis 1982; DPMA
1981,1986; Longenecker and Feinstein 1991c; Longenecker,
Feinstein et al. 1994). The fourth level makes it possible to
include the 106 element CS knowledge body of Turner and Tucker
(1991) and the 120 elements from the software engineering body of
knowledge. Elements of the software engineering body of knowledge
were explicitly derived from analysis of curriculum content
contained in reports on software engineering education developed
by the Software Engineering Institute (Ford 1990, 1991), and were
based on the observations of Glass (1992), other reports from the
SEI (Berry 1992; Ford, Gibbs, and Tomayko 1987; Ford and Ardis
1989; Ford 1994; Gibbs and Ford 1986; Shaw 1986, 1990; SEI 1991;
Tomayko and Shaw 1991), and other efforts (BCS 1989; Ford and
Gibbs 1989; Freeman 1987; Gibbs 1989; Leventhal and Mynatt 1987;
NSF 1993; Parnas 1990; Wasserman 1976).
Two Level View of the Body of Knowledge
Table A5.1 shows a two level hierarchy of the body of
knowledge. The three major subject areas are broken into
subareas. While Table A5.1 shows only two levels, the complete
body of knowledge (see Appendix 7) contains the expansion to four
levels.
Industry/Academic Survey of Required Depth of Knowledge
Table A5.2 shows a two level description of each of the subject areas of the body of knowledge in column 1. Columns 2 through 4 show data derived by surveying academicians on the importance of the various items to different categories of students (IS majors, IS minors and end users). Column 5 represents data derived from a survey of industry expectations for new hires (Mawhinney, Morrell and Morris 1994). By inspection of columns 4 and 5, it is evident that there is substantial agreement between industry expectations and the depth standard set by IS academics.
Table A5.2 shows that graduates of an IS program require comprehensive usage level of information technology. Graduates should be able to accept direction and complete tasks assigned (Denning 1992) and also be able to apply their knowledge without direction. This information has been used for setting depth expectations within IS'97.
| Body of Information
Systems Knowledge 1.0 Information Technology
2.0 Organizational and Management Concepts
3.0 Theory and Development of Systems
|
Table A5.1 -- IS'97 Body of Knowledge Presented as a Two Level Hierarchy. ( See Appendix 7 for the complete structure.)
| Body
of Information Systems Knowledge Elements |
Expected Knowledge Levels of Information Systems Professionals |
||||
| Survey of IS Academics | IS
Industry 1994 |
||||
| DPMA 12/93 Survey | IS'97 8/95 Review |
||||
| End User |
IS Minor | IS Major | IS Major |
Entry Level | |
| 1.1 Computer Architectures | 1.4 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 3.4 |
| 1.2 Algorithms and Data Structures | 1.3 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| 1.3 Programming Languages | 1.5 | 2.6 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| 1.4 Operating Systems | 1.4 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 3.1 |
| 1.5 Telecommunications | 1.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| 1.6 Database | 1.8 | 2.8 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| 1.7 Artificial Intelligence | 1.4 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| 2.1 General Organizational Theory | 1.8 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 2.6 |
| 2.2 Information Systems Management | 1.6 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 2.5 |
| 2.3 Decision Theory | 1.7 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 2.4 |
| 2.4 Organizational Behavior | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.4 |
| 2.7 Managing the Process of Change | 1.9 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.8 |
| 2.8 Legal and Ethical Aspects of IS | 1.5 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 3.5 |
| 2.9 Professionalism | 1.9 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.5 |
| 2.10 Interpersonal Skills/Communications | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 4.0* |
| 3.1 Systems and Information Concepts | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 |
| 3.2 Approaches to Systems Development | 1.5 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.4 |
| 3.3 Systems Development Concepts and Methodologies | 1.5 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 3.3 |
| 3.4 Systems Development Tools and Techniques | 1.4 | 2.6 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 2.5 |
| 3.5 Applications Planning | 1.7 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.0 |
| 3.7 Project Management | 1.6 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 3.0 |
| 3.8 Information and Business Analysis | 1.7 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| 3.9 Information System Design | 1.6 | 2.7 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| 3.10 Systems Implementation and Testing Strategies | 1.5 | 2.7 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 3.6 |
| 3.11 Systems Operation and Maintenance | 1.5 | 2.7 | 3.5 | 2.7 | -- |
| 3.12 Systems Development for Specific Types of Information Systems | 1.7 | 2.7 | 3.2 | 3.1 | -- |
| The data from IS academics was obtained in a DPMA sponsored national survey of IS program heads conducted by the IS'97 Curriculum Task Force in December 1993, and from a survey of 161 department heads and IS faculty conducted during the review of IS'97. The industry survey information was taken from Table 1, with 2.10 estimated from Figure 3, of Mawhinney, Morrell and Morris (1994). The knowledge levels are means of survey responses and represent the average depth of learning expected by the sample group where each respondent selected an integer knowledge level (where 1=Awareness, 2=Literacy, 3=Ability to Use and 4=Ability to Apply the indicated knowledge). | |||||
Table A5.2 -- Academic versus Industry Expected Competencies Return to Table of Contents